
Fast forward almost 60 years and if you were to look at my iPod you'd find I have more songs by Elvis than any other artist. I have almost everything he ever recorded including some that were not even released until after he died. Time has a way of changing things.


But as the computer techs and I wrestled with this printer issue for 3 days (not counting the two weekend days) a new realization came to me. Wireless printing was actually a technical possibility, even as Gutenberg invented the moveable type printing press. At the time, just the new idea of moveable type revolutionized printing throughout the known world. Putting books into the hands of the educated elite as well as common man helped to end the Dark Ages and usher in The Renaissance. Yet, as grand a thing as movable type printing was in the 14th century, wireless printing was even then a technical possibility. It just wouldn't become a technical reality for 7 more centuries and for 7 more centuries worth of critical thinking, 7 centuries of invention after invention building exponentially upon all the inventions and knowledge that had previously become a part of man's experience.

One of the great human tragedies is that, even today, in a world which is supposedly better educated than at any time in human history, most people are either incapable of critical thinking or unwilling to engage it. Almost no high school graduates are skilled in critical thinking, not to mention the 22% of kids who drop out of school and never finish what would have been their senior year of high school. Critical thinking is not required in most high schools where tests are multiple choice and where there is thus a 20 to 25% chance of getting the right answer just by guessing.
The lack of critical thought and recall of what should be common knowledge has become comedy fodder for the late night TV shows. The old joke has become a truism. Too many young people cannot answer the question, "Who is buried in Grant's tomb.
Added to the number of those who do not know how to think critically are those who refuse, for one reason or the other, to think critically. That situation applies to many of the men who call themselves bisexual or homosexual married men. The reasons are repeated over and over:
"I don't want to label myself."
"I don't want to question the religious values I was taught as a child."
"I don't want to make work out of something that should be fun."
"I don't want to get into an argument."
"I don't want to open a Pandora's Box."
"I'll think about that someday, but not now."
"I'm afraid of what I may find out about myself."
"My church says it is wrong to question its teachings."All of these "so called reasons" are really just excuses for maintaining the status quo. The sad thing about people is we fear the unknown. We fear change. The devil we know is preferable to the devil we don't know. We'd rather be unhappy than attempt to change something and find ourselves even more unhappy. I know about all these because I too used some of them for way too many years and I hear them from others all the time.

When I met my friend Mike almost 20 years ago, he was preparing to kill himself. Mike is still alive and well today for two basic reasons.
- He didn't really want to die.
- He really wanted to understand why he was so tormented and do something about it.
Working against him was the fact that he hates change. He hates planning, and he's an egotistical son of a bitch. Yep, some things were on both sides of the equation. They could be used to work for him or against him. It's actually true about many of our human characteristics.
There were things working for and against my helping him too. It was a huge time commitment for me. It took a very thick skin. People do not like their values and opinions to be questioned, even when their values and opinions are killing them. Anger is, more often than not, the result. I lost count of the times Mike told me to get the hell out of his life. Fortunately, I knew enough not to hold a grudge and he would always come back though one time he didn't speak to me for 6 months. That time, I thought I'd lost him. I hadn't. His torment was simply too much for him to bear alone.
Mike was lucky. He had an unwavering commitment from me to help him. When the time came that I had given him all the help I could in understanding his homosexuality within the context of his faith, I was able to turn him over to my wife for private counseling in dealing with the emotional issues of coming out to his wife and kids, and beginning a new life has a self-outed homosexual man.
Most guys don't have that kind of luck; and frankly, I've seen way too many who I was willing to commit to helping either refuse the help or quickly get angry and walk away from the help.
More often than not, those who refuse help are fundamental Christians. Admittedly, they are in a real bind. In their belief system they are literally damned if they do and damned if they don't seek help. Their church friends and their clergy constantly reinforce their feelings that they are damned. God's hates sinners, they tell him. He especially hates homosexuals. The more enlightened fundamentalists will tell him it is okay with God if you are a homosexual, but it is not okay with God if you act like a homosexual. How is someone in torment supposed to deal with that kind of crap?

Fortunately, not every fundamental Christian gets caught in this trap. With help, some of them open the trap and free themselves through critical thought and reasoning. My friend Bill is one example. Bill was not only a fundamental Christian, he was a Pastor and a homosexual married man. Not a pleasant circumstance for him at all.
Fortunately, by the time I got to know Bill he had already found some chinks in the "goodness" and "sinless" facade that fundamentals often present to the world. An astute business man, Bill had come to see that the way his fundamental church leaders ran the business components of their churches was not always ethical. This lack of ethics in one area let him conceive of a lack of ethics and truthfulness in questions of faith also. This discovery on his part proved to be the key to getting him to critically reason out a new life for himself and remold his religious faith into a more tolerant version.
The great thing about Bill's reordering of his life and his faith is that he did it in an honest, compassionate and ethical manner. His wife didn't enjoy getting the news that he was a homosexual man, but he gave her time to adjust to the reality. He used his powers of critical thinking to reason out a new life for each of them in which she was treated fairly financially and also given the option, which she was wise enough to accept, of accepting a new relationship with Bill based on friendship and the shared interest in their adult children and grandkids. Bill did not give up his faith, he just modified it into a faith based more on a compassionate Christ than an angry God. His wife maintained the faith she had once shared with him, but opened herself to a new relationship in the interest of the two of them and their extended family. All in all I think every one is now happier and certainly better adjusted than they have ever been. Such is the power of critical thinking.
I try to focus on the few who have effectively remade their lives reestablished their faith on a firmer foundation, but I'd be less than honest if I didn't admit that I despair about those who can't or won't. It haunts me that they in order to avoid hell in the next life, they have effectively made a hell of this life. It is a true faustian bargain. One that needn't have been.
Some will say I am as deluded as they to continue to profess my Christianity and my faith in God. They will say that I have fallen for a ferry tale offering eternal life because I am too weak to accept that dead is dead and death is the end. Within my present faith system, I accept that they might, in fact, be right. Faith is the belief in things unseen, and I have never seen God. Yet, over and over and over again, I've seen His influence and felt His presence in my life.
The fact is, I don't believe much at all of the traditional Christian concept of Heaven. Frankly, I wouldn't want to go there. If that it Heaven, the Kim Jong-un is God and North Korea is Heaven!
What could be more boring and more profoundly depraved than to sit around and sing praises to an egotistical God for eternity?
But Kim Jong-un is not God and North Korea is not Heaven. I have no idea what Heaven is or what is on the other side of this life. I feel there is something. Scientists are coming to realize that universes themselves are born, exist, die and are reborn in an eternal cycle. Reality as we know it is an awesome thing and we know almost nothing about it. In the endlessness of space and time who can say what and who remains hidden? As for me, I'll continue to rely on the faith I have build through years of critical thought. Even if I am ultimately wrong, my faith gives purpose and peace in this life. That is, in its own, enough.
I have faith in a life to come; but all I know, for sure, is we have this one here and now. It's best to think about what we want to do with it and what will make us the happiest in it.
Jack Scott
Thank you for sharing that very enlightening and thought-provoking reflection. I had not realized that Christians outside the Catholic Church were also expected to conform to that dichotomy that it is alright to be homosexual but not to act like one. I thought this kind of "have your cake and eat it" double-think was typical of authoritarian approaches in the Catholic Church. But perhaps it is a universal stemming from the fear of change inherent in the fundamentalist search for security.
ReplyDeleteYour welcome. Thanks for having the patience to read through it.
DeleteUnfortunately, many fundamental churches take the "be one, but don't act like one" approach to homosexuality. It is their way of making themselves believe that they are open to homosexuals in their membership.
Unfortunately, it tells the homosexual it is not alright to be himself and unambiguously relegates him to the ranks of deviants. Not so good for helping one accept himself.
Jack Scott